Archive for the ‘Alaska’ Category

Alaska’s Unique Pioneer Style

February 7, 2012

Denali's North Face as seen from a bush plane (TiresiasZ, 2006).

The best part about flying across the country is the time you get to shut off from the digitally-connected world to be left alone with your thoughts… Or your book. That is if you can resist paying the $7.95 for the WiFi connection. I didn’t give the airline the pleasure of having more of my money so I read some of Alpinist 37 and day dreamed about Alaska.

On that subject… there are several things that I like about Alaska above all other mountain-adventure destinations. It’s vast wilderness, it’s northern climate, and all the features that come with a remote, low-populated area. Compared to the Himalayas, Alps or Andes, there are few established communities that rely on and live in the mountain environment.

I don’t remember where I read this (though I wish I did at the moment,) but I realize its true, the Himalayas by contrast have several mountain villages scattered throughout the mountains. While those village residents rarely visit or rely on the mountains, they change the nature of climbing and trekking expeditions to the region. The villages provide milestones on a journey (if you’re romantic, they offer rustic culture). Alaska on the other hand, doesn’t have this. The Intuit, Haida and other Native Alaskans didn’t settle in mountain passes and consider such terrain simply white, treeless obstacles, but not the kind that dares you to overcome it.

Getting yourself to Alaskan climbing destinations in the Alaska Range, Wrangel Mountains or Revelations is often done by bush planes landing on glaciers or sand bars, depending on the time of year and conditions of the snowpack and river flow. This isn’t done in the Himalayas; helicopters are more common and the air density at the base of the mountains varies from route to route, and in some cases makes flight to that elevation too dangerous to attempt if not physically impossible. While the first glacier landing by bush plane was relatively early in Alaskan climbing history, in 1932 by Alan Carpe, there are routes that still necessitate starting the climb the old fashioned way… from the nearest road, on foot, oftentimes days away, with big packs. When David Roberts and Don Jenson and attempted Mount Deborah in the 1960s, they actually carried more gear than they could carry on their backs; they shuttled packs by carrying one pack at a time, dropping it off, returning for the other and repeat.

Dropping supplies by bush plane was a common practice through the 1960s for well-organized expeditions. This enabled a team to get part way up their chosen route without having to carry all the food and cooking fuel in their packs. However, it was inefficient and littering. Oftentimes the air dropped packages where smashed on impact, with canned goods opened and spoiling. Other times packages were never found. The practice has since been discontinued officially in some parts, like Denali National Park, and unofficially in others thanks to Leave No Trace ethics (which always makes me think of climbers choosing to leave a pack or extra ice axe up high out of a matter of convenience).
But walking in — what climbing guide author and former Denali Ranger, Jonathan Waterman, calls “Alaskan pioneer style” — is still necessary for access to Denali’s north face, Wickersham Wall, and long approaches from roads are required for other regions too, especially where there are no landing areas suitable for bush planes. And as Waterman points out repeatedly in High Alaska, it’s often the approach — especially the hazards or river crossings — that are more consistently life threatening than the ascents and descents.

Again by comparison, last I checked, the most common hazards en route to K2 or Broad Peak is the altitude and the food and water quality in Askole. Bears, river crossings, tussock fields, and an angry mother moose… They’re is nothing else like North America’s far north.

Thanks for dropping by again. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following the Suburban Mountaineer on Facebook or Twitter. Happy reading and carpe climb ‘em!

Andrew Skurka’s Alaska-Yukon Expedition

June 3, 2011

Back on March 15, 2011, I reported on Andrew Skurka’s presentation at the National Geographic Society in Washington, DC. During his presentation he talked about his 2010 Alaska-Yukon Expedition, which covered 4,679 miles cross country terrain of the far north.

National Geographic recently posted this to their website. I encourage you to watch it for a lot of reasons, but primarily because its inspiring. He pushed the limits of hiking and shares what raw Alaska is really like:

Well, thanks again for visiting. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following the Suburban Mountaineer on Facebook or Twitter.

Managing the Far North

March 15, 2011

Andrew Skurka taking questions at National Geographic.

Andrew Skurka visited Washington, DC and he presented at National Geographic’s headquarters last night. He talked about his 2010 Alaska-Yukon loop, that put him in the same category of great explorers as some of his heroes, like John Muir Ed Viesturs and numerous, reputable others.  

While Skurka has completed several long hikes in the past decade, including the Appalachian Trail, a sea-to-sea hike, and an enourmous western loop where he combined the Pacific Crest Trail and the Continental Divide Trail he had already hiked about 16,900 miles mostly on maintained trails. These were just the warm up for his latest self challenge.

On March 14, 2010 — a year ago yesterday — Skurka set out to cover 4,679 more miles in a self-created loop across Alaska and the Yukon Territory. This expedition was different than his other hikes mainly for two reasons: 1) Very, very little of it was on maintained trails or roads; and 2) Hiking cross country in the far north is a very different challenge from hiking in the lower 48 states and the lower part of Canada.

To do this hike, he applied himself to learn to ski, use a pack boat and navigate off trail in the backcountry — all of which were a necessity for success on this route. This was in addition to the hallmark of successful long hikes: Good, solid planning. As he put it, there are couple different kinds of people in the world, and he happens to be one that believes all of the world’s problems can be solved with Excel! Skurka shared examples of his spreadsheets representing terrain, distances and checkpoints. It allowed him make reasonable estimates for supplies and distances.

Skurka appears to be a rather fit and durable athlete. Part of his durability, or the appearance of it, may stem from the fact that he is risk adverse. A few people in the audience gawked at that comment. But I agreed with him. While he maintains a high level of fitness, he also avoids situations where the risk is not manageable. His problem solving skills and new knowledge of backcountry navigation proves this point: At one point he came to a raging river flowing into the Gulf of Alaska. Instead of taking his packboat into the Gulf or stringing a rope, he evaluated his map and determined the least risky path was to follow the source of the river to the head of the glacier that fed it, blow up the pack boat and paddle across. In this way, his expedition has the appearance of looking easy.

The other reason Skurka deserves historic company with Muir is because of his sense of wilderness. I’ll talk about this a little more later, but I will say that his isolation from civilization brought him closer to the land and the wildlife. Humbling is probably the best single word to describe it.

He completed the loop where he started, in Kotzbue, Alaska on September 5, 2010 around 10:00 p.m. without fanfare.

Well, thanks again for visiting.  If you enjoyed this post, you can following the Suburban Mountaineer on Facebook or on Twitter (@SuburbanMtnr). There you’ll get more information and news as I come across it.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.