Boldest Ascent in Alaska: No. 5

1963 Wickersham Wall Direct

I wrote that the Harvard Route on Denali, a.k.a. Wickersham Wall Direct, about this route not long ago. It actually surfaces in daydreams now and then. Sometimes it’s haunting.

In the spring of 1963, Harvard University students of the Harvard Mountaineering Club Hank Abrons, Rick Millikan, Peter Carman, John Graham, Don Jensen, David Roberts, and Chris Goetze drove from Boston, Massachusetts across the continent and north to Denali National Park and Preserve. Their objective was the north face of Denali. The artful black and white photography of Bradford Washburn helped inform them of their “preferred” route.

The wall rises from an ice fall, of cleaved glacial fissures, at a mere 5,000 feet, and then rises in a steep, and steady slope for 15,000 feet to the mountain’s modestly junior north summit.

The route was extremely dangerous and it was the first big mountain any of them have ever attempted. Roberts would later explain in multiple places that they climbed in a state of naivety. They thought the whizzing sound of rocks flying past them, the tumbling down the slope only an arm’s stretch away, and the frequent avalanches,  were part of the routine experience. More matured climbers might have retreated or may not have started up at all.

Still, all of the climbers escaped uninjured and the first — and to date only — ascent of the Wickersham Wall Direct remains unrepeated.

It is without a doubt one of the boldest ascents in Alaska and on an iconic setting, which is why it is number five.

Be sure to check in tomorrow at 3:00 p.m. Eastern U.S. time for the fourth boldest ascent in Alaska. [To jump to the next post, click here.]

If you enjoyed this post, please consider following The Suburban Mountaineer on Twitter and Facebook.

The Boldest Ascents in Alaska

Today we start to countdown the top five boldest ascents in Alaska. Asking the question “what is the boldest ascent in Alaska” has been part of a quest. The goal is not to crown an Alaskan Piolet d’Or actually, but the exercise yields insight into two subjects that I have always been interested in: Alaska and human achievement in the mountains.

Bold is a unique characteristic of historically significant climbs, and Alaska’s climbing history, I felt, had an unusually large pool of climbs that could be considered bold. With input and insight from several leading Alaskan climbers and experts on Alaskan mountaineering history, including Steve Gruhn, Jonathan Waterman, Mark Westman, Damien Gildea, Clint Helander, John Frieh, and Jason Stuckey, we formed this lengthy list of nominees for the boldest ascent in Alaska.

What is a Bold Ascent

We also worked hard at appropriately defining what made a bold Alaskan ascent. It’s a pioneering ascent that carried significant risk, relative to the route and style of the climb. Furthermore, the boldest of these ascents challenged conventional thinking and may have defied what we thought about humans in the mountains. As a rubric, we identified these four factors to consider:

  1. Pioneering — Did the ascent break ground on a new route or technical challenge?
  2. Dangers — What were the risks the alpinists faced and were they extraordinary?
  3. Style of Ascent — Was the ascent done in siege-style, fast and light, or traditional alpine?
  4. Impact — Did the ascent change the way people thought about adventures in the mountains? Although, because climbs don’t always have influence over our collective daily life, I think “significance” might be a more suitable term that identifies the right climbs without being concerned about the outside reach of the ascent..

Making the Cut

What might be just as interesting as the top five list I’ll share over the next few days, is the list of ascents that didn’t make the grade. The list ascents nominated don’t all meet the rubric. In some ways, the style of the ascent addressed the dangers too much, or the ascent was dangerous but it wasn’t pioneering, and while it had an impact, it was outweighed by almost all of the other climbs on the list. Here are two examples that are great ascents regardless of this trivial exercise:

  • Mount Augusta’s North Face by Jack Tackle and Charlie Sassara in 2002. — This is an adventure of climbing, but not an ascent. The route was evidently dangerous when Tackle was struck by a large rock — the kind that whistles like a bomb from a B-52 all the way down. Sassara had to go for help, leaving Tackle alone on the mountain nearly 7,000 feet up. Tackle was rescued off his narrow ledge, nestled in a sleeping bag, by a man dangling from a helicopter. This is an amazing story of climbing and heroism but isn’t a great ascent.
  • East Face, Mount Russell, Charlie Townsend and Dave Auble in 1989 — This route was partly inspired by photographs by Bradford Washburn. The route was a massive mixed route including deep rime on the upper section, and Townsend and Auble intended to, rather than rappel or downclimb, to parapent (glider parachute) down to the base. The dangers of the wall and the foul weather urged them to say they that if either of them fell the other would just glide down. They ascended without a tent and only with bivy sacks, and the conditions of the crumbly rock made descending in a traditional manner worrisome. Even once at the summit, the swirling clouds indicated that it was a bad time to fly. They were forced to downclimb a thousand feet and bivied in their sacks, then they endured a five-day “fury” of a storm in which they were mostly exposed (1990 AAJ). At last, after ten days on a mountain that attracts horrible, they jumped and flew down in eight minutes. The journey was an epic of “survival,” to use Townsend’s word (1990 AAJ). For the purpose of this project it was significant for being one of the first glider descents, and it was certainly dangerous, it wasn’t as pioneering as some of the climbs that ranked higher on the list. You’ll see why.

Honorable Mentions

However, we have two honorable mentions that didn’t make the top five list, but that deserve some special highlight:

  • Steve Hacketts’ solo 3rd ascent of Mount Igikpak in 1976 — First, Mount Igikpak is in the Brooks Range. It’s remote. It’s the largest peak in Schwatka Moutains. The first and second ascent were not done in the impressive style Hackett lead. Hackett traveled solo by boat and a pied to the peak. It’s a true Alaskan adventure in the old pioneering sense before bush planes amd helicopters took us to base camp. The danger lurked everywhere as he approached the summit pyramid as it is overhanging on all flanks and relied on old gear from the previous ascents. This could so easily have been called a stupid ascent rather than a bold one. However, his style, the danger, and significance makes it stand out as uniquely bold.
  • Dora Keen Goodwin’s and George Handy’s Ascent of Mount Blackburn’s East Peak in 1912 — Keen Goodwin was a adventurous woman ahead of her times. She was already an accomplished mountaineer when she visited Alaska, but Mount Blackburn was the unclimbed highest peak in the Wrangel Mountains. It would be her greatest ascent. Her first attempt in 1911 was unsuccessful and was far from the summit slope. Her style and determination kept her going until she returned the following season, only earlier and better prepared. She and Hardy used a 3,500-foot high gully sided by ice towers and deep snow. The ascent saw terrible snowfall that slowed progress and added to the danger. Other members of the expedition fled as 20 feet of snow fell over 13 days. She and Hardy made the summit and were later married. She wrote about her climbs and adventures in thr widely published magazines of the day and it played a role, if a modest one, on the women’s suffrage movement which won women the right to vote in the United States a few years later. It’s bold qualities make s it stand out as historically significant.
  • Infinite Spur of Mount Foraker by Michael Kennedy and George Lowe in 1977 — This ascent has few peers. As Kennedy and Lowe made final preparations, guidebook writer Jonathan Waterman wrote, that the ascent was a “tremendous leap into the unknown” for it’s scale. The route was bigger than Denali’s Cassin Ridge, more sustained and had few if any places to bivy (Waterman, High Alaska). For 11 days, they climbed about 14 hours per day under heavy packs, rarely hauling them. They endured spindrift avalanches, Kennedy took a 20-foot leader fall, climbed under cornices, at one point they bivied under a serac, and low on food and stove fuel they reached the top. They had stretched their physical and mental abilities to succeed. At the crux, Kennedy recalls stepping “outside himself” and visualizing success at the top. The next thing Kennedy recalled was Lowe jumaring up to him (ibid.) Because of the dangers and the challenge they faced, this is clearly among the boldest ascents ever done in Alaska.

Later Today

As bold as these ascents were, there are five more that are even bolder. So check back after 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time to see the number five of the boldest ascents in Alaska. [To jump to the next post, click here.]

Thanks again for stopping by. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following The Suburban Mountaineer on Twitter and Facebook.

Boldest Ascents in Alaska — Updating the List Once More

My quest to name the boldest ascent in Alaska is nearing its end. On Monday at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time I will start the countdown of the five boldest ascents in Alaska. I’ll post at the same time each day through Friday.

The list of climbs everyone has nominated has evolved. In fact, I’ve been modifying my personal list for weeks in spare moments between family, work, and social responsibilities. Since the initial list that I made with several experts help last year, I’ve added almost a dozen more ascents including three more that I added earlier this week. Here they are:

  • Mount Emmerich, Fred Beckey, Jack Tackle, and Craig Zaspel, 1976.
  • Mount Augusta’s North Face by Jack Tackle and Charlie Sassara, 2002.
  • Linkup of the third ascent of Denali’s Isis Face and the fourth ascent of the Slovak Direct by Katsutaka Yokoyama, Yusuke Sato, and Fumitaka Ichimura, 2008.

So be sure to stop by TSM on Monday to kick off the list in the morning and then again in the afternoon with the fifth boldest ascent in Alaska — at least what I think is the fifth boldest ascent in Alaska.

And so you don’t have to click back to here, this is the complete list:

Late 1800s

  • 1897 first ascent of St. Elias by the Duke of Abruzzi

Early 1900s

  • Sourdoughs 1910 Denali North Peak FA.
  • Dora Keen and George Handy’s 1912 ascent of the East Peak of Mount Blackburn.
  • Moore/Carpe’s FA of Fairweather 1931.

1960s-1970s

  • Wickersham Wall Direct, Denali, by Hank Abrons, Rick Millikan, John Graham, Don Jensen, David Roberts, and Chris Goetze, 1963.
  • Harvard Route, Mount Huntington, Roberts, Hale, Jensen, Bernd, 1965.
  • Allen Steck and John Evans 1965 Hummingbird Ridge FA on Logan.
  • Art Davidson’s and Rick Millikan’s 1966 first ascent of Kichatna Spire.
  • 1967 first winter ascent of Mount McKinley by Art Davidson, Ray Genet, and Dave Johnston.
  • Charlie Porter’s 1976 Solo of the Cassin.
  • Mount Emmerich, Fred Beckey, Jack Tackle, and Craig Zaspel, 1976.
  • Steve Hacketts 1976 solo 3rd ascent of Mount Igikpak (followed by paddling 365 miles back to civilization.)
  • Infinite Spur, Foraker, Kennedy-Lowe, July 1977.
  • Johnny Waterman’s 1978 solo Mt Hunter Traverse.
  • North Face (“Timeless Face”) of Huntington, Simon McCartney and Jack Roberts, July 1978.

1980s-1990s

  • Southwest face of Denali, Simon McCartney and Jack Roberts, June 1980.
  • 1981 East Face of Moose’s Tooth by Mugs Stump and Jim Bridwell.
  • Southeast Spur, Mount Hunter, Alpine style by Glenn Randall, Peter Metcalf, and Peter Athens, 1981.
  • Moonflower 1981 FA by Mugs Stump.
  • Andy Politz’s 1984 FA of St. Elias South Face.
  • Naomi Uemura’s 1984 solo winter ascent of Mount McKinley.
  • East Face of Mount Hunter by Jim Donini and Jack Tackle in 1985.
  • Wine Bottle, Mount Dickey, Orgler, Bonapace, 1988.
  • East Face, Mount Russell, Charlie Townsend and Dave Auble, 1989.
  • Phil Kaufmann’s. Steve Carroll’s, and Patrick Simmons’ 1995 first (and to date only) ascent of Mount Orville.
  • East Butt of University Peak by Buhler/Sassara in 1997.
  • Thomas Bubendorfer’s 1997 solo first ascent of Mount Laurens.

2000s-present

  • Slovak Direct, Denali, House, Twight, Backes, 2000.
  • Blood from the Stone, Mount Dickey, Ueli Steck and Sean Easton, 2001.
  • Infinite Spur, Foraker, House and Garibotti, 2001.
  • Mount Augusta’s North Face by Jack Tackle and Charlie Sassara, 2002.
  • Entropy Wall on Mount Moffit, climbed in 2007 by Jed Brown and Colin Haley.
  • Linkup of the third ascent of Denali’s Isis Face and the fourth ascent of the Slovak Direct by Katsutaka Yokoyama, Yusuke Sato, and Fumitaka Ichimura, 2008.
  • Haley and Aartun’s Dracula Route on Mount Foraker, 2010.
  • Kevin Cooper’s and Ryan Jennings’ ascent of “Stairway to Heaven” on Mount Johnson in 2014.
  • Ryan Fisher’s and Nathan Lane’s 2014 first ascent of Mount Muir from tidewater.

[To read the kick off to the final list of the top five boldest ascents of all Alaskan climbing history, click here.]

Thanks again for stopping by. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following The Suburban Mountaineer on Twitter and Facebook.

Bold Routes and Amazing Resources

My favorite climbing guidebook: High Alaska by Waterman (Andrew Szalay)

When I was about to share my final list of the five boldest ascents in Alaskan climbing history on Monday, I realized that one climber that I thought would be included — Jack Tackle — wasn’t a part of the five I identified.

Shouldn’t the boldest routes in Alaska be done by some of the most renowned Alaskan climbers? Think about it. Would you accept my list if it didn’t have a Steve House, a Hudson Stuck, a Bradford Washburn, or a Mugs Stump in one if not all of the ascents?

I say all that to say that I hope to start on Monday, May 18. I plan to post at 3:00 eastern time and each day at the same time that week. It will be a count-down to the boldest ascent in Alaska. Thanks for bearing with me.

I was tempted to skip posting anything this week, but I know how much some of you like book recommendations. Here is a list of resources I have referred to during this project, some of which are books and publications you can access:

The Experts — By far, the input from people like Steve Gruhn, Jonathan Waterman, Mark Westman, Damien Gildea, Clint Helander, John Frieh, Jason Stuckey and readers like you have been the most valuable resource to me. Reading through the resources below only get you so far and certainly don’t put things in position to be compared against everything else. They also identified ascents I wouldn’t have considered, and provided insight that one big visit to Alaska can’t get at.

The Scree — This is the annual publication of the Mountaineering Club of Alaska. It’s edited by Gruhn and covers more ascents in Alaska than the American Alpine Journal and in more detail. It’s available to MCA members, and archives are online.

American Alpine Journal — This has long been my favorite annual publication. Every August I start to read through it as quickly as possible, pulling out whatever interests me. It’s available to American Alpine Club members or for purchase on the AAC website, but I think it alone might be worth joining. The online search tools on the AAC website has been very useful.

High Alaska — Quite possibly the greatest climbing guidebook ever written. Waterman wrote this with the help of original black and white photography of Denali, Mount Hunter, and Mount Foraker from the great Alaskan pioneer Bradford Washburn.

On the Ridge Between Life and Death and The Last of His Kind — These two books by David Roberts are full of nuggets about Alaskan mountaineering that I have been pulling on since they were published. I continue to be inspired by them in whole and in parts.

After these, it’s mostly been a handful of recent articles online from Alpinist, Climbing, Rock and Ice, Gripped, and a few miscellaneous blogs.

Thanks again for stopping by. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following The Suburban Mountaineer on Twitter and Facebook.

Is There a Conspiracy for Indoor Rock Climbing?

If you perceive the world largely through media, and you believe in conspiracies, you’d think the Climbing Wall Association was a master manipulator. But that’s only if you believe in conspiracies.

Since Tommy Caldwell and Kevin Jorgeson freed the Dawn Wall on El Capitan, traditional media outlets, for example The New York Times, have been putting more climbing stories into the mainstream U.S. media market than ever before. If you read this The New Yorker article, you might extrapolate that the publishers are trying to tap into the millennial generation and trying to keep their interest.

The stories since the Dawn Wall ascent haven’t, however, been about new routes on granite in Yosemite or nuttall sandstone in the New River Gorge. Rather, they have been about the social movement toward climbing that has already been underway for well over a decade. The focus of which has been on the attraction of the indoor climbing experience:

  • In the same article from The New Yorker on March 30, it alleged that indoor rock climbing is the new tennis for networking.
  • Men’s Journal said indoor rock climbing is the new CrossFit on April 2.
  • On March 12, The New York Times attributes the leap in climbing skills outside on rock in the younger climbers to the proliferation of climbing inside.
  • Smaller papers have stories too, but they’re making less provocative statements.

The rise of indoor rock climbing has been happening for years, but the popularity among younger climbers has lead to more gyms; nine percent more in 2014 alone and an unprecedented 15 percent increase in bouldering-specific indoor climbing gyms during the same period, according to the Climbing Business Journal.

I have always climbed in an indoor gym. My first was near Niagara Falls, NY in the mid-90s, but it was merely a substitute for climbing in the Adirondacks, which was a six-hour drive from home; the gym was only 30 minutes away. But recently, indoor climbing gyms have become a destination even on my business trips just to get a feel for what climbers in another town value and enjoy.

Maybe I am catching the fire, but I don’t even look down at indoor climbing any longer. But Justin Roth, who manages marketing communications, social media, and public relations for Petzl America and keeps his own blog at The Stone Mind, put everything into proper perspective in a recent blog post: “Indoor climbing is no longer just preparation for outdoor climbing; it is its own pursuit.”

So if it’s not a conspiracy, is it a movement?

Thanks again for stopping by. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following The Suburban Mountaineer on Twitter and Facebook.

In Alaska, What is Bold?

Thank you, everyone, for your input on what are the characteristics of what makes a bold climb, and your suggestions for what is the boldest ascent in Alaska. I want to thank three people in particular: climber, mountaineering historian and author Damien Gildea, the editor of The Scree Steve Gruhn, and climbing instructor Norm Rasmussen who all left some lengthy comments after my last post.

This exercise — of seeking the boldest ascent — could have covered any region. I chose Alaska because it’s special. It’s at the edge of the far north (or is the far north, depending on your mental map). It’s also vast wilderness with few towns and outposts. There are no porters. Bush planes are the mode of reaching the backcountry. Predators are bigger than just Giardia. And the mountains are big, cold and famous for routes with knife-edge exposure.

But to get at what makes the boldest ascents, we need to state what bold really means and what characteristics the greatest bold ascents must posses.

What is Bold?

In its simplest terms, bold is about accepting risk and taking action with confidence. As John Frieh pointed out earlier, the risk and confidence could be interpreted as being foolish. In Alaska, a bold ascent needs a little more explanation.

Fundamentally, the danger that accompanies great Alaskan ascents differentiate bold ascents from ordinary ascents. The danger or risk on ascents are different, as Gildea pointed out. The danger might be a route under a serac. The danger might be self imposed, such as going ahead with a long route with an extremely light rack. And the risks and bold qualities of ascent for a siege-style ascent are going to be different for an alpine-style ascent or a single-push climb. I genuinely appreciated Gildea’s clear perspective on this definition. It was very helpful.

In addition, there is an element or breaking ground into the unknown, either in terms of danger, route, rate of ascent, equipment, and general adversity. The pioneering spirit varies from one ascent to another, and this might be a great separator. Gruhn is spot on with this point. Rasmussen carried on the notion of pioneering in a different way: Some ascents challenge perceived limitations. While breaking new ground in a pioneering fashion is essential, if it changes the way we actually think about what the climb accomplished on a human level it stands out even more.

So for our purposes a bold Alaskan ascent is a pioneering ascent that carries significant risk, relative to the route and style of the climb. The boldest of the bold ascents challenged conventional thinking and may have defied what we thought about humans in the mountains.

The Factors

To compare the ascents, however, we need the definition to provide factors for considering each ascent. These are, unfortunately, subjective. If you ever wondered how in the world the Piolet d’Or committees come to their decisions — ones you and I frequently disagree with — then try naming one ascent the boldest ascent in all of Alaskan climbing history. But for exploring the history, this is the best exercise that was compelling to me.

Please keep in mind that these factors are not standards but matters that must be considered and balanced with one another:

  1. Pioneering — Did the ascent break ground on a new route or technical challenge?
  2. Dangers — What were the risks the alpinists faced and were they extraordinary?
  3. Style of Ascent — Was the ascent done in siege-style, fast and light, or traditional alpine?
  4. Impact — Did the ascent change the way people thought about adventures in the mountains?

These factors should help with my other objective, of considering the boldest ascent in Alaska of all-time.

What’s Next

As soon as possible, while balancing a busy work season at Habitat for Humanity, family and personal responsibilities, I will roll out the top five boldest ascents in Alaska. I am going to roll them out over a five-day period while sharing a profile each day and naming the boldest ascent in Alaska on day five. In the meantime, please follow some of my thoughts on this on Twitter and Instagram with the hashtag #BoldAlaska.

[To read the next post in this series, click here.]

Thanks again for stopping by. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following The Suburban Mountaineer on Twitter and Facebook.