K2 and Curious Finds

One of our guests during the Thanksgiving holiday here in the states actually let me talk his ear off about Alaska and I even brought out the scrapbook. Among other things, I told him about a curious find I made while scrambling up Ptarmigan Peak outside of Anchorage, just off the Power Line Trail.

Well above the scree, as high on the choss as I felt I could climb, I found a bone. It was over a foot long and clearly from an animal’s limb. Because where I found it was so steep, it wasn’t clear how it had gotten there. The bone looked only slightly weathered, so it probably hadn’t been there for long.

We talked about some theories. My favored one places the animal on the ridge I later used to get higher on the peak, where it fell off or even died and it’s parts later came to rest on this ledge. The tarn at Ptarmigan Pass is right below about a thousand feet, where almost everything flows into a loose pile of broken stone, where the rest may have landed. It makes good bar room conversation.

But something a little more interesting caught my eye when I read Alpinist 37 last winter. The cover photo was fascinating: It is recognized as one of the oldest photos of K2, and it’s owner makes a solid case that it is the first photo of K2 ever.

Keese Lane did a brief write-up for Alpinist‘s High Camp newsletter about how this image arrived on the cover of 37. My curiosity has taught me that this story is just a starting point. The rest of the story is a bit bigger and a good one about climbing history.

As a related note, preserving these images and artifacts like this one of K2 is important. It inspires people like you and me to not only explore our mountains but also our libraries and other collections.

It’s also interesting to see what triggered the so-called “tipping point.” I’ll fill you in more later. For now, have a good rest of your week and check out that note from High Camp.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider following the Suburban Mountaineer on Facebook or Twitter, because I believe climbing matters, even though we work nine to five.

Hurricane Sandy and Some Brief Notes

Hurricane Sandy Does Well for Water Industry (Szalay 2012)

Hurricane Sandy Does Well for Water Industry (Szalay 2012)

The whole region of greater Washington, DC has shutdown for at least the day like much of the Mid-Atlantic and the east coast. It’s nice to get an unexpected three-day weekend with Natalie and our Wunderkind, but I’m sure there are neighbors that are alone and dreading the anticipated power outages more than we are.

Yesterday, I had the chance to draw out a rough reference map of Baffin Island. I like to draw out my own maps for the areas I am interested in mainly because it helps me develop a better mental picture of valleys, fiords and distances. For instance, when I grew up on the US-Canadian border area in Upstate New York, that was the center of the world from which I judged distances to Alaska and the Adirondacks. But when I got to those places, they were where I viewed the world. So the exercise of looking at the world through Baffin Island as the world’s center has the advantages of making my vicarious perspective of Baffin Island a little closer to a first person perspective. Mark Synnott’s guide has been an amazing resource and I highly recommend it even if just for the rich, colored photos.

Also, while I am slowly turning into a casual rock climber, my favorite way to go vertical is by climbing water ice. One of the most amazing ice climbs is Spray On at Helmcken Falls in British Colombia. I posted a video on my Facebook page that you might enjoy checking out.

Lastly, I’m putting together a giveaway that I hope to let everyone know about tonight or tomorrow morning. I’m just waiting on one thing. Anyway, I think you’ll all like it.

Thanks for dropping by again and if you’re in the storm’s path, enjoy the adventure, have a beer and please stay safe.

Also, if you enjoyed this post, you can get follow the Suburban Mountaineer on Facebook or Twitter. Climbing matters, even though we work nine to five.

Two Kinds of Armchair Mountaineers

26752352953_2f525f4141

Flip open an old AAJ and draw. (All rights reserved)

The term armchair quarterback refers to a know-it-all with no real-world experience. They’re critics; quick to assess and lay judgment.

The term armchair mountaineer can be applied the same way sometimes, but I think we need to draw a distinction. Armchair mountaineers in this context have never climbed (or have on a very limited basis), think they know enough about it to render a judgment — most often criticizing other climbers and climbing events.

Whenever a disaster happens on Everest, or recently the deadly avalanches in the Alps or in Nepal, there is someone there to claim they “get it.” Then they claim that we ought not be climbing at all or why more regulation is required.

I take a different approach and use the term armchair mountaineer quite differently. In fact, the differences have made me consider dropping the term’s use altogether. When I say I spend a lot of my time “armchair mountaineering,” I mean I am reading and researching climbing history and current trends. The image that ought to come to mind is someone like me, sitting by a fireplace with a book (or several) with a map laid out on the ottoman while sipping a cup of freshly ground coffee or a beer from Otter Creek (in a glass, rarely the bottle.)

I trying not to lay judgment. I’m genuinely interested in mountaineering — in the achievements reached in the mountains. I also try to defend the sport. There are too many aspects worth celebrating to get down and discouraging.

(By the way, I’ve been taking a new look at Fitz Roy in Patagonia and will be talking about that shortly. Also, I just received in the mail Mark Synnott’s climbing and skiing guide to Baffin Island (Patagonia North, in some ways) and I look forward to drawing from that to share some thoughts on this season’s alpine accomplishment’s on Canada’s largest island. Let me know if you have any ideas for topics. I always enjoy your feedback too.)

Thanks again for stopping by. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following The Suburban Mountaineer on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.

Gone Climbing

I feel a little weird saying this, but the question “Who died?” is a common one late at night in my home. After Wunderkind goes to bed, Edelweiss and I like to read in the evenings. I usually have a climbing book or magazine. Then it comes.

I’ve started lying that no one in my current chapter or article died. Mostly it’s true. But there are a lot of stories of being stranded with HAPE, HACE, worsening frostbite, falling, avalanche, rock fall and snow bridges or cornices collapsing into voids, or alpinists learning of friends that go missing on a climb. I’m not morbid. I’ve never read these stories to contemplate death. I’m interested in the climb and the life of the climber. So my wife’s question, has bordered between becoming tiresome and comical.

Before I started writing this blog I read past the headlines of deaths of climbers, including the famous ones. Dying on a climb was something I avoided both in practice and in… I guess you’d call it concept or theory. I kept thoughts of dying climbing in the distance. But much of the news about climbing, except in the sources I typically refer to (see Mountain Links) are only talking of accidents and death; I just wanted news of attempts on jagged peaks.

Reading of climbing deaths in histories of Alaska or the Himalayas is somewhat detached. I notice deaths as if it were the death of Lou Gehrig — an important man in baseball from before my time, but I never had a reason to mourn.

In the process of obtaining best “inside track” for news on current climbing news through  the American Alpine Club, climbing magazines in print and online and connections through social media, I’ve developed some relationships — a term I used in the broadest possible sense. Some I’ve conversed with once or twice, others I just follow like they are celebrities.

Along the way, my interest in them has developed a familiarity. When news came of Bjørn-Eivind Årtun’s death with his partner Stein-Ivar Gravdal on attempting a route in Norway, I did not react the way I have before. I couldn’t dismiss it. I felt I knew him. He climbed with Colin Haley on Mount Foraker. He was strong and progressive.

Then there was Michael Ybarra. I didn’t follow him, but I knew about him from his writing in the Wall Street Journal. Then Yan Dongdong — a pioneer of Chinese alpinism — and just recently, Roger Payne. Roger left his wife, Julie Ann Clyma.

I wanted to hear more from them. I wanted to hear about their next ascent or plans to tackle something in Sichuan. I wanted them one day to say, I’m too old for this, go on into old age and die comfortably in their easy chair with family or their life partner nearby.

These climbers are heroes and people that inspire us and some of us live vicariously through. Hearing of their demise in their pursuit for their next objective — their quest for happiness, arguably — makes their conclusion harder to take. They’re end is not like that of hearing about your favorite actor or baseball player; actors don’t die from the risks of their performance and ball players don’t pass away from the conditions in the outfield.

My climbing heroes die doing what I want to do. It doesn’t make me appreciate climbing less — at least I don’t think so. At the moment, it adds a more complex, personal element about my acquaintance’s humanity and my own.

So to Bjørn-Eivind, Michael, Dongdong and Roger… Thanks for sharing your stories.

And thank you for dropping by yet again. If you got something out of this post, you might want to consider following me on Facebook or Twitter because I believe climbing matters, even though we work nine to five.

Climbing out of Pain

I had my back X-rayed to help identify why my intermittent back pain hasn’t gone away despite visits to a chiropractor, some physical therapy and working out once again. The pain comes like a phantom late at night. It wakes me up and the pain persists until I sit up for a little while or maybe practice some yoga moves — something that, until recently, considered unmanly. Then the tension relaxes enough and I can continue sleeping.

I visited my primary physician for a check-up and to go over the X-ray results. I’m in my thirties, so back pain is already somewhat embarrassing. While I’m not a hardcore mountain man in the alpinist sense, I do want to maintain a level of health and fitness that I can at least jump into some moderate climbing, hiking and skiing for recreation. So what the X-ray report said worried me —  something about degenerative disc changes. I didn’t understand much else on the report, but I knew that meant arthritis.

The doctor assured me that it was mild. I said okay, but as I left I didn’t feel better. I didn’t know what mild meant. For some people mild hot sauce was hot. So wouldn’t this be relative too? Plus, I’ve always understood arthritis to be a slow path to increasingly worse pain and restrictive movement. It was a weird moment: I could see the future — five or ten years from now — and it was me sitting hunched over at a chair at my daughter’s ice skating competition, unable to comfortably sit back, and not being fit or flexible enough to climb since last weekend and unable to walk — or hike — long distances.

I was given marginally qualified comfort from my doctor and a referral to see a spine specialist to be safe and determine what else needs to be done. I made an appointment for as soon as I could based on my existing family and work commitments, which was yesterday morning.

The arthritis — or the trace amount that the X-ray actually showed — wasn’t causing my pain. I felt my shoulders fall back and I probably exhaled in relief. It was something else, but it wasn’t a flaw noticeable in the report. It wasn’t arthritis or anything more severe, as far as it showed. The spine specialist thinks he can treat the issue, which seems more muscular from an old injury flaring up — which we think was related to when I was unfit just a year ago.

But the arthritis in my back could be an issue one day. The prescription was welcomed with glee: Keep moving. Ski, hike, walk, run, and climb! Movement itself lubricates the joints and actually helps fight off becoming inflexible. I was given an excuse — or maybe even a mandate — to workout, stay active, and have fun!

I was reminded of the Forbes piece (yes, the financial magazine of all publications) on the 10 healthiest sports: Two of my favorites scored highly: Cross country skiing and rock climbing. These two inspire me to workout. Hopefully between training right, well and good treatment, I will finally loosen the reoccurring knot in my back and I’ll be sitting upright — with good natural posture at my daughter’s skating competition and looking forward to our weekend in the hills.

Thanks for stopping by, as always. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following the Suburban Mountaineer on Facebook or Twitter, if you haven’t already. Happy reading and carpe climb ‘em!

The Rumor of Haley and the Moonflower Buttress

On Sunday, I saw a Tweet saying that Colin Haley had soloed the vast majority of the Moonflower Buttress on Mount Hunter in the central Alaska Range. I got excited immediately. The word came from the John Frieh. That’s credible. John wouldn’t post news he didn’t think was untrue.

A short while later Frieh posted a correction; it wasn’t Moonflower — the route made by legendary alpinist Mugs Stump on the toughest wall in the Alaska Range — but it was indeed a solo on Mount Hunter’s North Buttress. According to the updated Tweet, Haley came to within about 300 meters of the summit. Stump didn’t go to the true summit either, for the record.

This is exciting because it hasn’t been verified yet. And it’s Wednesday night now when I am writing this! We live in a time when a plane crashes, everyone knows about it. Twenty-four hour news alerts us and our friends. Twitter travels faster than sound too, it seems. News is inescapable.

But news from remote ranges (at least other than Everest and El Chalten) news still travels slowly. Like before Twitter, on-demand TV, and speed internet. Well, maybe not quite, but you get the idea.

Compare the Central Alaska Range (other than Denali basecamp and it’s West Buttress route, of course) to news from Mooses Tooth, the “Moonflower” wall, or Mount Huntington: Recently on Mount Everest we saw how the news trickled out from Mount Everest a few weeks ago where 10 climbers died. However, the town of Mount Everest Basecamp (unincorporated) is wired. While I don’t know the quality, phones and Internet are available in some format. Getting news is simply (as if anything is simple) a matter of passing radio messages from up high to Basecamp, Khumbu, Nepal. From there someone will be happy to email, Tweet or update their blog with your information.

So why hasn’t more news come forward about Colin Haley’s attempt? My guess is that Haley is probably exhausted in camp, or climbing something else, or trying again. He doesn’t tend to sit still for long.

But there is also the matter of how inconvenient it is to get word from his location to the rest of the world. Some other unconfirmed news has it that Haley descended with a group of Japanese climbers. If so, we may have received word of his work from them.

All of this speculation and skepticism reminds me of golf. I played a round of golf on Friday with some work colleagues as part of a charity tournament. It was up to us to record our strokes accurately. What was to stop one of us from claiming we had a lower score on a hole? It’s about honesty and honor, really. But there is credibility too. It’s unlikely that I would be putting down a string of birdies. People know my handicap.

In Haley’s case, most of us know his track record. It’s Stump-esque. And if he turned around about 300 meters from the top, I’m sure it was tougher than what 99 percent of climbers today could do.

Thanks for dropping by again. If you enjoyed this post, please consider following the Suburban Mountaineer on Facebook or Twitter. Happy reading and carpe climb ’em!